John Finamore
The University of Iowa, Classics, Faculty Member
This paper examines Hermias’ doctrine of the vehicle of the soul to determine whether or not it is the same doctrine as that endorsed by Proclus and his teacher Syrianus. It is discovered that Hermias, like Proclus and Syrianus, believes... more
This paper examines Hermias’ doctrine of the vehicle of the soul to determine whether or not it is the same doctrine as that endorsed by Proclus and his teacher Syrianus. It is discovered that Hermias, like Proclus and Syrianus, believes that human beings have three levels of bodies: an immortal, ethereal vehicle, which houses the pinnacles (ἀκρότητες) of the soul’s irrational faculties; a pneumatic vehicle, which has those faculties in a more expansive form (as it were, the pre-existing traces of the faculties); and the corporeal body, in which the irrational faculties are operative. Hermias’ doctrine therefore is that of Proclus and Syrianus, as further evidence from Hermias’ discussion of the bodies of the daemons verifies.
Research Interests:
This is a follow-up to my "Reason and Irrationality: The Intersection of Philosophy and Magic in Later Neoplatonism," in R. Fowler (ed.), Plato in the Third Sophistic, Walter de Gruyter (2014), 39-55. Here I examine Iamblichus' theories... more
This is a follow-up to my "Reason and Irrationality: The Intersection of Philosophy and Magic in Later Neoplatonism," in R. Fowler (ed.), Plato in the Third Sophistic, Walter de Gruyter (2014), 39-55. Here I examine Iamblichus' theories of dream interpretation and divination and try to show that in the ancient Mediterranean world these were not considered irrational concepts. I trace the history of these interpretations from Homer and Hesiod through Plato and the Middle Platonists to Iamblichus himself, arguing that throughout antiquity the interpretation of dreams and the use of divination were not deemed unusual or irrational, as we might conceive of them today.
Research Interests:
An examination of Iamblichean theurgy in line with his metaphysics. Theurgy provides the link between the otherwise unbridgeable distance between the gods and mortals.
Research Interests:
A look into Iamblichus' theory that light has material and immaterial aspects.
Research Interests:
A consideration of how mind/soul coalesces with body in Iamblichean metaphysics.
The doctrine of the the tripartite soul in the Timaeus differs from that in both the Republic and Phaedrus. I argue that Plato's doctrine has been affected by considerations about the soul's disembodied life.
An examination of the unusual phrase "second trace of life," used by Hermias to describe (apparently) the irrational soul.
Research Interests:
Galen of Pergamum (129-c.210 CE) was the physician of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius. During his first stay in Rome (162-166 CE), he came to fame by conducting public dissections of animals before learned audiences of physicians and... more
Galen of Pergamum (129-c.210 CE) was the physician of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius. During his first stay in Rome (162-166 CE), he came to fame by conducting public dissections of animals before learned audiences of physicians and philosophers, in which he sought to display his expertise especially concerning the system of nerves in the body. During this stay he also began writing his De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis (On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato), in which he intended to demonstrate that these two writers were in agreement concerning the nature of the tripartite soul. He wrote the
first six books at that time, and completed the final three books during his second Roman sojourn in 169-176 CE.1 In this paper I wish to consider Galen's arguments for the tripartite soul. I will argue that Galen's interpretation of Plato's Timaeus while not always accurate is nonetheless a kind of interpretation generally found in the later-Platonic period, and I will defend him against some recent scholars who have seen him as unphilosophical.
first six books at that time, and completed the final three books during his second Roman sojourn in 169-176 CE.1 In this paper I wish to consider Galen's arguments for the tripartite soul. I will argue that Galen's interpretation of Plato's Timaeus while not always accurate is nonetheless a kind of interpretation generally found in the later-Platonic period, and I will defend him against some recent scholars who have seen him as unphilosophical.
